Skip to main content

Changing Churches


I became a Methodist because of bus-strike. Well, actually, that’s not quite true. The Presbyterian Church that my family belonged to was about three miles from where we lived. Now today, in these days of two-car families, people would think nothing of travelling three miles to church, in fact there are certain churches I know which draw their congregations from within a 40 mile radius, which, given the size of Northern Ireland is quite a parish. It really should make us re-think what we mean by the local church.

But that’s now… I’m talking about then. The early 1970s in Belfast. Years of riots, bus-strikes, bombs, vigilantes, and no-car families. My Dad often had to work on a Sunday and my mum eventually got fed up dragging me and my brother down to the bus-stop to wait for bus which might or might not turn up, depending on whether the drivers were out on strike, the UDA had their barricades up or the IRA had burned down the bus depot. So she look us along to the nearest church which happened to be Methodist.

I remember a few things about my first visit to the Methodist Church with my mum. First, there were people standing in the hallway welcoming people. Not just giving out hymnbooks, but actually welcoming people, and there IS a difference, but I’ll come back to that later. But not only were we welcomed as a family, there was a person there who specially welcomed my brother and me... Imagine welcoming children to church!? What a strange idea! The welcome continued into the service where the minister even invited us up to the front for the children’s talk, and, it seems to me, looking back through those rose tinted spectacles we frequently put on when looking back at our childhoods, that he was always interesting. Perhaps he was interesting because he was interested.

The most startling thing however, was the building itself, which was modern, and bright, and warm. It wasn’t exactly designed with children in mind, as you couldn’t actually see anything at the front if you were under 5 feet tall, because it was really long, the pews were all on the flat and the pulpit wasn’t raised up very high, unlike the Presbyterian church where, as a child I always felt as if the top of my head was going to fall off because I had to look so high up to see the preacher in the pulpit. But I didn’t care about not seeing what was going on up at the front most of the time. If I couldn’t see them then they couldn’t see me, and I would be left to my own devices (Is this the same principle which encourages adults to sit in the back pew? More of that anon.) But I learned a lesson then that I have never forgotten, which is that architecture affects our worship more we realize.

Actually, if truth be told, the Methodist Church wasn’t quite the nearest church, as there was a small Catholic Chapel which we passed en route to the Methodist. But given the era in which I grew up, attending that church was never an option. This was deepest, darkest, Protestant East Belfast… and because of that they didn’t advertise their presence too much. There were no bells, or stained glass windows, no crucifix or even a sign outside. To the casual observer it just looked like and electricity sub-station. I was never inside it so I never got to see if it was so Spartan inside. It was a full 10 years before I was inside a Catholic Church, only to discover that it was no more exotic than many Protestant Church buildings. I’ll never get the chance to visit it now however, as it was replaced by a complex of luxury flats, probably occupied by middle class nominal Protestants, who wouldn’t care whether the nearest church was Presbyterian, Methodist, Catholic or Hindu, because there won’t cross the threshold of any of them.


Comments

ScatterCode said…
I became a Methodist (from Presbyterian) because, when I was looking for a church, I wandered in off the street one Sunday and they were nice to me.

I have spent the 5 years since then trying to think up a more theological story, and so far have failed.
Being nice to people more often might just be a sign that our theology was right... Orthopraxy stemming from orthodoxy etc

Popular posts from this blog

A Woman of no Distinction

Don't often post other people's stuff here... But I found this so powerful that I thought I should. It's a performance poem based on John 4: 4-30, and I have attached the original YouTube video below. A word for women, and men, everywhere... "to be known is to be loved, and to be loved is to be known." I am a woman of no distinction of little importance. I am a women of no reputation save that which is bad. You whisper as I pass by and cast judgmental glances, Though you don’t really take the time to look at me, Or even get to know me. For to be known is to be loved, And to be loved is to be known. Otherwise what’s the point in doing either one of them in the first place? I WANT TO BE KNOWN. I want someone to look at my face And not just see two eyes, a nose, a mouth and two ears; But to see all that I am, and could be all my hopes, loves and fears. But that’s too much to hope for, to wish for, or pray for So I don’t, not anymore. Now I keep to myself And by that

Psalm for Harvest Sunday

A short responsive psalm for us as a call to worship on Harvest Thanksgiving Sunday, and given that it was pouring with rain as I headed into church this morning the first line is an important remembrance that the rain we moan about is an important component of the fruitfulness of the land we live in: You tend the land and water it And the earth produces its abundance. You crown each year with your bounty, and our storehouses overflow with your goodness. The mountain meadows are covered with flocks and the valleys are filled with corn; Your people celebrate your boundless grace They shout for joy and sing. from Psalm 65

Anointed

There has been a lot of chatter on social media among some of my colleagues and others about the liturgical and socio-political niceties of Saturday's coronation and attendant festivities, especially the shielding of the anointing with the pictured spoon - the oldest and perhaps strangest of the coronation artefacts. Personally I thought that was at least an improvement on the cloth of gold canopy used in the previous coronation, but (pointless) debates are raging as to whether this is an ancient practice or was simply introduced in the previous service to shield the Queen from the TV cameras, not for purposes of sacredness, but understandable coyness, if she actually had to bare her breast bone in puritan 1950s Britain. But as any church leader knows, anything performed twice in a church becomes a tradition. All this goes to show that I did actually watch it, while doing other things - the whole shooting match from the pre-service concert with yer wumman in that lemon-